Websites that work for you

We're a small team based in Scotland. We turn small business websites into effective marketing tools.

Contact Us

Switch to multi-article view to view each article or recital from all three institutions side-by-side

View Commission's Position on Recital 21b

EU Commission's Position

As adopted 14th September, 2016

Recital 21b

N/A

Recital 21b doesn't feature in the Commission's proposal.

View Council's Position on Recital 21b

EU Council's Position

As adopted 25th May, 2018

Recital 21b

N/A

Recital 21b doesn't feature in the Council's adopted proposal.

EU Commission's Position

As adopted 14th September, 2016

View Council's Position on Recital 21b

Recital 21b

N/A

Recital 21b doesn't feature in the Commission's proposal.

EU Council's Position

As adopted 25th May, 2018

View Commission's Position on Recital 21b

Recital 21b

N/A

Recital 21b doesn't feature in the Council's adopted proposal.

EU Parliament's Position

As adopted 12th September, 2018

Update 14th September 2018: This proposal is the version adopted by the EU Parliament on 12th September 2018. Emboldened text denotes an amendment.

Recital 21b (new)

Specific exception to permit the legitimate uses of extracts

Despite some overlap with existing exceptions or limitations, such as the ones for quotation and parody, not all content that is uploaded or made available by a user that reasonably includes extracts of protected works or other subject-matter is covered by Article 5 of Directive 2001/29/EC.

A situation of this type creates legal uncertainty for both users and rightholders. It is therefore necessary to provide a new specific exception to permit the legitimate uses of extracts of pre-existing protected works or other subject-matter in content that is uploaded or made available by users.

Where content generated or made available by a user involves the short and proportionate use of a quotation or of an extract of a protected work or other subject-matter for a legitimate purpose, such use should be protected by the exception provided for in this Directive.

This exception should only be applied in certain special cases which do not conflict with normal exploitation of the work or other subject-matter concerned and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the rightholder.

For the purpose of assessing such prejudice, it is essential that the degree of originality of the content concerned, the length/extent of the quotation or extract used, the professional nature of the content concerned or the degree of economic harm be examined, where relevant, while not precluding the legitimate enjoyment of the exception.

This exception should be without prejudice to the moral rights of the authors of the work or other subject-matter.

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. Read more

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close